Sunday, October 2, 2011

October 2, 2011

1 Corinthians 1:21-31

+In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

In today’s lesson from First Corinthians Paul writes, “For Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom, but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles.” Today is the first Sunday in October, the sixteen Sunday after Pentecost. We’re on the far side of the liturgical calendar from Holy Week and the crucifixion. I would suspect that many of us are happy about that. The joy of Easter is something to look back to and look forward to with gladness. The crucifixion is another matter entirely. It’s unpleasant. It’s uncomfortable. The crucifixion represents a breakdown of any system of justice—not that there was one in Pilate’s Palestine. Crucifixion was the nastiest, cruelest, most demeaning form of capital punishment that could be applied to anyone.

Because the crucified one is our Lord and Savior, we revere the cross. We bow to it as it passes us in the procession. But are we willing to acknowledge what it represents? What does it mean when Paul says we preach Christ crucified? After all, we worship Jesus, who in the eyes of the world was an abject failure. We worship the carpenter’s son who rode into Jerusalem on a donkey. We worship a God who took on the flesh of a poor man in order to participate in the most painful and humiliating experiences that being human has to offer. When we preach Christ crucified—not Christ risen and triumphant—we preach Christ nailed to a cross. We are called to stand with all those who suffer, those who hunger and thirst, those who are punished unjustly.

We are called to stand with the poor. The poor aren’t an abstraction. They are flesh and blood people like you and me. They are not a category. They are individuals. Some of them are people that I meet in the community kitchen. They are people whom you pass by on this very street day after day. You’ve passed by Felipe, a double amputee. Felipe sleeps between parked cars at night. His story is a painful one, of depression, of an attempted suicide, of family estrangement. You’ve passed by Betty, who has schizophrenia. You may not have noticed her, because when she’s taking her medication she’s hard to pick out of a crowd of passers-by. You’ll notice her when she can’t stand the side effects and goes off her medication. Then she responds to voices you and I can’t hear. You’ve passed by Reggie, who has a new spring in his step now that he’s left the shelter and living in the community. It took not months but years to reach this goal. You’ve passed by Deedee pushing her disabled child in a stroller as she heads to the food pantry. She can’t afford enough food for her family. Her wages cover her rent but not much more. Sometimes Deedee has to decide whether to eat or to pay the gas bill.

The poor are near and they are also far away. Today, as we observe our creation cycle at the Chapel of the Cross, I’m thinking of the legions of poor people who suffered during Hurricane Katrina six years ago. It’s hard to even remember the horror of what happened in New Orleans and on the Mississippi coast. People of all stations in life suffered; a hurricane is no respecter of wealth or status. But the poor suffered even more. In New Orleans the wealthy Garden District was comparatively unscathed. Not so the Ninth Ward, where mostly poor people live. Even after six years the Ninth Ward hasn’t completely recovered. It may never be fully restored.

Disasters such as Hurricane Katrina show us that our concern for social justice can’t be separated from our concern for the environment. When the earth hurts, we all hurt. And the poor hurt more than any of us. It’s easy to be complacent. Major disasters like hurricanes don’t occur every day. When they do, they grab our attention. Easier to ignore is the way the environment affects the food supply. On a smaller scale, droughts and floods decrease the amount of available food. The biofuel industry competes for grain that would otherwise be part of the food supply. Population and economic growth put pressure on the food supply as well. Who feels it first? Who feels it the hardest? The poor. Production is only one problem in providing enough food for people. We waste a LOT of food. It’s estimated that in developed countries over two hundred pounds of food per person are wasted every year. Still, many people, even right here in Chapel Hill, go hungry.

All of what I’ve said so far sounds rather gloomy. It is. But when we preach Christ crucified, we preach resurrection as well. There are signs of resurrection right here in the Triangle. You may have noticed trucks with the words “Interfaith Food Shuttle” on the sides. The Food Shuttle collects food from grocery stores and restaurants that would other wise be thrown into the trash. This food is still safe and good to eat, but is considered not quite fresh enough for retail sale. The Food Shuttle then distributes the food they’ve collected to soup kitchens and other organizations so that those who are hungry may be fed.

Food Shuttle isn’t the only reason for hope. There is an organization right here in Chapel Hill, led by one of our own parishioners, that works to better the lot of both the earth and its people. Farmer’s Foodshare helps support local farmers and sustainable growing practices. Farmer’s Foodshare buys up produce from farmer’s markets and makes it available to soup kitchens and food pantries. What is the result? Local farmers receive help to survive financially in these tough times, and those who need food assistance have access to fresh farm food, not just factory food. We all win—farmers, consumers, and the earth.

So what, you may be wondering, does supporting local farmers and the poor have to do with preaching Christ crucified? Everything, as it turns out. When we preach Christ crucified we’re not just talking about the salvation of individual souls. We’re talking about the salvation of everything. We’re talking not only about our souls but the salvation of everyone of us, of all creatures great and small, of the salvation of the very earth on which we live and move and have our being. Amen.

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Sixth Sunday after Pentecost

Proper 12A

1 Kings 3:5-12

Romans 8:26-39

Matthew 13:31-33, 44-52

If you’re a regular, or even semi-regular church-goer, you’ve probably been asked by a skeptical friend or relative if you really “believe all that stuff about the virgin birth and the resurrection of the body.” To many folk who pride themselves on their rational and inquiring minds, these doctrines seem quite implausible. After all, the virgin birth and the resurrection of the body appear to violate what we think we know about the laws of nature.

You might be relieved to know that I’m not planning to unpack those tenets of the faith for you this morning. Among other reasons, I don’t feel equal to the task, and we don’t have the time. Instead, I’d like to talk about an aspect of our Christian faith in which I think all of us have great difficulty believing.

Whatever we might say to the contrary, I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say that it’s something that even the most devout Christian believer struggles with at times. What we have a hard time believing is that God loves us. More specifically, we have a hard time believing how MUCH God loves us. I’m not at all sure that this difficulty comes from any notion we have that we’re fundamentally unlovable. It’s not necessarily a problem, or not only a problem, of feeling worthy before God.

Our difficulty in believing how much God loves us is a result of OUR human finitude. Our difficulty in grasping how it’s even possible that God can love us to the extent that God does is due to our own limitations. WE have limited time, a limited attention span, and limited patience. We find ourselves stretched to our very limits by the competing demands on our own love. Our partners, our children—toddler and teenager alike, our aging parents and often our friends all ask for a part of us. Even the family pets ask for our love and attention! At the very least we may feel harried, and we may even feel overextended. It’s easy to think that God does too.

The theologian Robert Farrar Capon likes to compare our difficulty in comprehending the range of God’s abilities to the difficulty that an oyster would have in understanding how much humans are capable of. An oyster, as we know, is confined to its shell and living underwater. An oyster cannot conceive of a being that can move about freely in its less restricted environment. Similarly, we can’t really grasp the extent to which God’s capabilities far exceed our own. Our very human limitations are analogous to the oyster’s immobility. As the oyster is limited in the scope of its movement, so are we limited in our ability to love by our human constraints of time and attention.

Have you ever thought a concern was too trivial to bring before God in prayer? I know I have. It’s tempting to save the big stuff, like life or death situations, for God. It’s easy to think that seemingly trivial matters are a waste of God’s time. And we wouldn’t want to waste God’s time, because God only has so much, right? Well, NO. WE only have so much time, though even we probably have more than we think we do. God, though, being God, doesn’t share our limitations. While we’re tempted to act from a presumption of scarcity, God just doesn’t work that way.

God is all about abundance. That’s what Jesus has been telling us these past few weeks in the lessons from Matthew’s gospel and what Jesus is telling us in our reading from Matthew today. We’ve heard the words “the kingdom of heaven is like” over and over again. It’s been suggested that you could read these parables substituting the words “the love of god is like…” for “the kingdom of heaven is like…” Let’s try it and find out what we hear.

The love of God “is like a grain of mustard seed which a man took and sowed in his field; it is the smallest of all seeds but when it has grown it is the greatest of shrubs and becomes a tree, so that the birds of the air come and make nests in its branches.” What a lovely image! The love of God starts out as something seemingly insignificant and grows into something living, spreading, and nurturing. The love of God grows from something so small as to be barely visible into a tree that provides a place to nest and be safe, a tree in which one can be fruitful and multiply.

If that image isn’t powerful enough, the next parable provides us with another one. The love of God “is like leaven which a woman took and hid in three measures of meal, till it was all leavened.” At first glance this doesn’t sound like a big deal, until you look at a commentary and learn that three measures is a huge amount of flour. Three measures of flour is equivalent to 128 cups; that’s sixteen five pound bags! The leaven—yeast, most of us would call it—will work its magic with the flour until its volume is multiplied. Once the leavened dough is baked, there will be enough bread to nurture and nourish perhaps not the entire kingdom, but certainly a rather large crowd! And notice, please, that in this parable the stand-in figure for God is a woman!

The kingdom of God, or if you prefer, the love of God, is also like a pearl or a treasure. The love of God is worth all of what one possesses. The love of God is worth EVERYTHING. That any single thing could be worth everything flies in the face of conventional wisdom. “Don’t put all your eggs in one basket,” is a well-known piece of advice, and probably good advice in some situations. You won’t find that phrase here in Matthew’s gospel, though. The kingdom of God, the love of God, IS worth everything.

The love of God is like a nesting place, a vast supply of bread for the body and the soul, a treasure in a field, and a pearl of great price. In case we haven’t gotten the message by now, Jesus gives us another one. He tells us that the kingdom of heaven, or if you prefer, the love of God, “is like a net which was thrown into the sea and gathered fish of every kind; when it was full, men drew it ashore and sat down and sorted the good into vessels but threw away the bad.” At first glance this might seem like a case of good news/bad news. Gathering every kind of fish indiscriminately is indeed good news. We might feel some concern about the sorting, though. But fear not. It’s Jesus who is speaking here, the same Jesus who eats with sinners and tax collectors, the very same Jesus who tells us that we must be willing to forgive not just seven times but SEVENTY times seven times!

If we’re still feeling uneasy about the prospect of sorting and judgment, turning to Paul’s words for today from the Letter to the Romans gives us much reassurance concerning God’s great love for us. According to Paul, God even helps us to pray when we’re not able to. “The Spirit helps us in our weakness; for we do not know how to pray as we ought, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with sighs too deep for words.” Can you imagine a more loving action from God? With Paul, then, may we all say, “For I am sure that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Amen.

Monday, May 30, 2011

Memorial Day 2011

Remembering with gratitude those who made the ultimate sacrifice and praying that we will study war no more.

Gonna lay down my sword and shield
Down by the riverside
Down by the riverside
Down by the riverside
Gonna lay down my sword and shield
Down by the riverside
Ain't gonna study war no more.

refrain

I ain't gonna study war no more,
I ain't gonna study war no more,
Study war no more.
I ain't gonna study war no more,
I ain't gonna study war no more,
Study war no more.

Gonna stick my sword in the golden sand;
Down By the riverside
Down by the riverside
Down by the riverside
Gonna stick my sword in the golden sand
Down by the riverside
Gonna study war no more.

refrain

Gonna put on my long white robe;
Down By the riverside
Down by the riverside
Down by the riverside
Gonna put on my long white robe; Down by the riverside
Gonna study war no more.

refrain

Gonna put on my starry crown; Down By the riverside
Down by the riverside
Down by the riverside
Gonna put on my starry crown;
Down by the riverside
Gonna study war no more.

refrain

Gonna put on my golden shoes;
(ETC)
Gonna talk with the Prince of Peace;
(ETC)
Gonna shake hands around the world;
(ETC)

Monday, April 25, 2011

Maundy Thursday 2011

John 13: 1-17, 31b-35

+In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

Peter said to Jesus, “You will never wash my feet. Jesus answered, “Unless I wash you, you have no part in me.”

Peter isn’t the only one who has reservations about footwashing. Just last week I had lunch with a friend who happens to be a Presbyterian laywoman. She asked me about our Maundy Thursday service, and I explained to her that we would wash feet of any wished, celebrate the eucharist, and strip the altar in preparation for Good Friday. My friend is polite to her very core, but she still wrinkled her nose as she said, “Really? I don’t think we ever do a footwashing service on Maundy Thursday.”

I suspect that a great many of us Episcopalians might share my friend’s feeling about liturgical footwashing. I’d be surprised if anyone among us ever had a hard time finding a seat at such a service. For a people who worship God incarnate in Jesus, we are strangely uncomfortable with contact with the actual flesh of other people. I can remember a time when some folks would remain on their knees just to avoid exchanging the peace. And we’re twenty-first century Americans with on-demand hot running water; we can’t understand why we’d want to go anywhere, much less church, to have our feet washed or to wash the feet of others. We take pride in doing things by ourselves and for ourselves.

In Jesus’ time, though, footwashing was understood as an act of hospitality. Still, the disciples are puzzled by Jesus’ act of washing their feet. Peter especially has a problem with having Jesus wash his feet. To Peter, having Jesus wash the feet of a disciple seems like a violation of the proper relationship between them. As with many other things Jesus has done in his time with the Twelve, Peter just doesn’t get what Jesus is trying to do. At first he refuses Jesus’ offer to wash his feet. When Jesus tells Peter he must wash his feet, Peter wants his head and hands washed as well. Peter is so like the rest of us. When he realizes he’s said the wrong thing, he proceeds to put his foot even further into his mouth.

But I suppose we shouldn’t be too hard on Peter. Even in a cultural context where foot-washing was a common practice of hospitality, it would have been downright weird for one’s host to start washing feet in the middle of dinner. We can be pretty sure that it isn’t concern for hygiene or even comfort that’s motivating Jesus. I think we can also be sure it’s not ritual cleanliness that’s on Jesus’ mind. Jesus presents a model of servanthood, to be sure. But the lesson that Jesus teaches by washing the feet of his disciples reaches beyond even servanthood.

By washing the feet of his disciples, Jesus teaches them what it’s like to be in loving relationship with one another. By washing his disciples’ feet, Jesus teaches them about mutuality in love. Jesus turns the whole notion of the master-servant hierarchy upside down. He offers service to the very people who think it’s their job to serve him instead. By performing the service of foot-washing for his disciples, Jesus teaches them how to receive service. By this point in Jesus’ ministry, the disciples know what doing service looks like. They’ve seen Jesus touch lepers and minister to outcasts. They’ve seen him eat with people whom others consider beyond the pale. Now, as their own feet are washed by Jesus, they learn what it’s like to be the ones who are served, to be the ones who receive service.

The lesson that Jesus teaches in the foot-washing is one that we too would do well to learn. Most of us have internalized the idea that it’s more blessed to give than to receive. I’d venture to guess that most Christians believe that it’s better to serve than be served. Most of us like to think of ourselves as givers and helpers. It certainly is good to give and it’s certainly good to help. But if we are givers and helpers only, and are never receivers, we perpetuate a hierarchy in which some people are defined as being better than others. If we refuse what others offer, if we refuse the service of others, we may—without meaning to—deprive someone else of the chance to give and serve.

We may want to keep Jesus’ lesson in mind as we think about our relationships with the poor and homeless in our community. We may want to keep Jesus’ lesson in mind as we think about our relationships with those who are ill or disabled in any way. It is a very good thing indeed that we are eager to serve people who may appear to be more in need of assistance than we ourselves are. But in our enthusiasm for serving others, it may be easy for us to forget what gifts that they have to offer us. Yes, we want to emulate Jesus and be washers of feet. But Jesus, too, had his feet washed with ointment by Mary, who dried Jesus’ feet with her hair. Sometimes it is as blessed to receive as to give. Sometimes it is as blessed to be served as to serve. Mutuality is essential to truly loving relationships, like the one Jesus has with the disciples. Mutuality is essential to truly loving relationships, like the one Jesus has with his Father. “Unless I wash you,” says Jesus, “you have no part in me.” Amen.

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Presentation of Our Lord Jesus Christ in the Temple

February 2, 2011

Luke 2:22-40

+In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

The burning question for today, for some of us, is whether or not the groundhog saw his shadow. Tradition has it that if the day is sunny and the groundhog sees his shadow, there will be six more weeks of winter. If it’s a cloudy day and the groundhog doesn’t see his shadow, spring is just around the corner. As a child growing up in the New York City suburbs, I found Groundhog Day kind of annoying. No matter what the groundhog saw, you could be pretty sure there would be six more weeks of winter and then some.

It may or may not surprise you to know that there is a similar tradition around Candlemas, which is another name for the holy day that we are observing here now. The name Candlemas comes from an ancient rite for the blessing of candles to be used in the church in the coming year. There’s an old English song that says, If Candlemas be fair and bright,/ Come winter, have another flight; / If Candlemas bring clouds and rain, / Go winter, and come not again.

For the moment let’s leave aside the connection between groundhogs, church candles, and predictions for future weather. Let’s turn instead to our Gospel reading for today. This reading from Luke provides an account of the baby Jesus being brought to the temple for the traditional Jewish dedication. Because we know who Jesus is, it’s hard for us to imagine this event without a great deal of pageantry and fanfare. If we’ve seen the medieval paintings of the presentation, complete with the halo over the head of the baby Jesus, it’s doubly hard to imagine this scene as ordinary. But ordinary it was.

Mary and Joseph almost certainly weren’t the only couple bringing a baby son to the temple that day. Jewish law required that firstborn sons be brought to the temple and dedicated to the Lord. The mothers of sons were required to present themselves thirty-three days after the birth of a son that they might undergo ritual purification. So likely there would have been many sets of observant Jewish parents at the temple on that same day.

What’s striking about our Gospel reading is the things it doesn’t say. There is nothing in Luke’s account that mentions that many people in the temple took note of Mary, Joseph, and the baby Jesus, who we know was a very special baby indeed. There is nothing in Luke’s account that mentions that the chief priests or anyone in the temple hierarchy took any notice at all. What most people there saw was a very ordinary couple with a baby fulfilling their obligation under Jewish law. If anyone remarked about anything even slightly out of the ordinary, it might have been to remark that the mother was very young but the father much older, and that they didn’t look like prosperous people.

Apparently hardly anyone noticed the baby Jesus, with two notable exceptions. One of them was an old woman named Anna. Anna was a widow of unusual devotion. According to Luke, “she did not depart from the temple, worshiping with fasting and prayer night and day.” Anna knew that when she saw the baby Jesus she had seen something close to God.

The second person, Simeon, was a “righteous and devout man,” Luke tells us. Simeon was led by the Holy Spirit to come into the temple on that particular day. He had been also told by the Holy Spirit that “he should not see death before he had seen the Lord’s Christ.” When Simeon saw the baby Jesus come into the temple with his parents, he took Jesus in his arms and said the words that we have come to know as the Nunc Dimittis: “Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word; for mine eyes have seen thy salvation which thou hast prepared in the presence of all peoples, a light for revelation to the Gentiles, and for glory to thy people Israel.”

It wasn’t the rich or powerful who recognized the light of Christ when they saw it; it was those whose piety made their eyes and hearts and minds open to revelation. Many of us spend considerable time looking for signs. We read our horoscopes in the newspaper, we study stock market trends to look for the next hot investment, and we look at the sports pages to try to figure out if UNC will beat Duke, or vice versa. We tend to look out for the extra-ordinary things, the things that for some reason or another stand out.

But all the looking we might do is to no avail unless our eyes are open to see what is right before our eyes in the ordinary things of life. Anna and Simeon didn’t recognize Jesus for who he was because they were brilliant or because they had any kind of psychic gifts. Anna and Simeon knew Jesus as the Lord’s Christ, the Lord’s Messiah, because they were both in the holy habit of keeping their hearts and minds turned to God. I pray that you and I might learn to do the same, that our own hearts might be open to the light of Christ when it is in our midst. Amen.